Post by shiha520 on Feb 11, 2024 9:59:00 GMT
Internal control is a term that is used in different contexts, but, as a discipline, it is possible to abstract a univocal understanding: it is a set of processes, conducted by bodies and agents of a given institution, with the aim of obtaining an adequate degree of organization. In this sense, associated with the context of public management, it is not limited to the portrait of internal control captured by article 70 of CRFB/88: accounting, financial, budgetary, operational and patrimonial supervision. Currently, in defense of elementary principles such as legality and advertising, it is also acting, eg , for transparency and the protection of personal data.
From this context, and as a result of the autonomy attributed to each federative entity, a plurality of types of structures and attributions of public internal control bodies and agents within the scope of the Legislative, Executive and Judiciary, in the different entities of the federation. Despite this, it is Canada Email List possible to say that everyone works to fulfill objectives imposed on (or set out by) their organization. This plurality, in any case, influenced recent decisions by the Judiciary that shed light on the discussion about the exercise of duties, within the scope of internal control, by civil servants in commission positions and functions of trust.
In the context of internal control, as well as in any other context relating to public power, these duties must be restricted to management, leadership and advisory duties — obviously not being possible to perform technical duties, as stated in article 37, item V, of CRFB/88, and the thesis of general repercussion, signed in the Extraordinary Appeal (RE) nº 1.041.210/SP , which provided for the constitutional requirements required for the creation of commission positions [1] and, therefore, logic, to trust functions. According to the thesis of the topic of General Repercussion No. 1,010, established from RE No.
From this context, and as a result of the autonomy attributed to each federative entity, a plurality of types of structures and attributions of public internal control bodies and agents within the scope of the Legislative, Executive and Judiciary, in the different entities of the federation. Despite this, it is Canada Email List possible to say that everyone works to fulfill objectives imposed on (or set out by) their organization. This plurality, in any case, influenced recent decisions by the Judiciary that shed light on the discussion about the exercise of duties, within the scope of internal control, by civil servants in commission positions and functions of trust.
In the context of internal control, as well as in any other context relating to public power, these duties must be restricted to management, leadership and advisory duties — obviously not being possible to perform technical duties, as stated in article 37, item V, of CRFB/88, and the thesis of general repercussion, signed in the Extraordinary Appeal (RE) nº 1.041.210/SP , which provided for the constitutional requirements required for the creation of commission positions [1] and, therefore, logic, to trust functions. According to the thesis of the topic of General Repercussion No. 1,010, established from RE No.